A San Francisco jury this afternoon awarded the Bay Guardian $15.6 million after determining that the SF Weekly and its corporate owner illegally sold below-cost ads in an attempt to run the locally-owned paper out of business, the Guardian, AP and the Chron report.

At the end of the five-week trial, Guardian Publisher Bruce Brugmann told the jury that his paper would have to close if it lost the case.

Jurors were told that the SF Weekly had lost money for the past 12 years. The Guardian’s lawyer suggested that the Weekly’s owners were willing to accept such losses in the hopes they would force Brugmann out of business. The SF Weekly is owned by Village Voice Media of Phoenix, formerly known as New Times.

The jury awarded the Guardian $6.39 million in actual damanges, but part of the verdict is subject to treble damages, bringing the award to $15.6 million.

Rod Kerr, attorney for the Village Voice Media, said the 16-paper chain intends to appeal, according to the Guardian.

The SF Weekly said on its blog:

    “Today’s verdict in Bruce Brugmann’s suit was an expensive lesson in laws, lawyers, and lawsuits, and how one man’s obsession manipulated the system. Like Ralph Nader, Bruce Brugmann is out of touch with reality.”

On the other hand, the Guardian said on its blog that the $15.6 million award has larger implications:

    “[T]he verdict sends a clear signal to small businesses, independent newspapers and the alternative press that a locally owned publication has the right to a level playing field and that a chain can’t intentionally cut prices and sell below cost to injure a smaller competitor.”
SF Press Club News, ,


  1. I am happy The Guardian won its case– and I got a chuckle from the childish namecalling and how it fell flat: SFWeekly comparing Brugmann to Nader! (As if that were a negative.) (Seems they were hoping to score off a recent tiff between Matt Gonzalez and Brugmann.)

    The news is: San Francisco doesn’t want or need corporate-fueled franchises muscling in on local businesses. (And neither does any other city.)

    I admire Brugmann for sticking to his guns: something Nader is famous for.

  2. I didn’t see the the trial, but the SFW’s blog of the trial revealed more about the SFW than they had intended. It showed how much they hate Brugmann and desperately wanted to snuff out his newspaper. For the SFW, this had gone from being a business dispute to something very personal, and ugly on their part. Now they’re in denial of the verdict, almost pretending as if it didn’t happen or that everybody else is crazy and they’re the only sane people around. I used to think Brugmann was nutty, but he now sounds like a “voice of reason” compared to the craziness of the SFW.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>